http://www.mikekujawski.ca/2010/02/04/my-response-to-the-twitter-debate-on-the-nyt-and-new-yorker-blogs/ Mike Kujawski's blog on government, association and non-profit marketing in a Web 2.0 world Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:31:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.mikekujawski.ca/2010/02/04/my-response-to-the-twitter-debate-on-the-nyt-and-new-yorker-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-41560 Privacy Commissioner of Canada’s Twitter Policy « Public Sector Marketing 2.0 – Mike Kujawski's blog on strategic marketing & social media engagment Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:32:23 +0000 http://www.mikekujawski.ca/?p=1154#comment-41560 [...] all of you still stuck trying to convince the “clay-layer” of middle-management that Twitter can be used for significantly more strategic purposes than finding out what Justin Bieber is up [...] [...] all of you still stuck trying to convince the “clay-layer” of middle-management that Twitter can be used for significantly more strategic purposes than finding out what Justin Bieber is up [...]

]]> http://www.mikekujawski.ca/2010/02/04/my-response-to-the-twitter-debate-on-the-nyt-and-new-yorker-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-34739 The importance of “context” « Public Sector Marketing 2.0 – Mike Kujawski's blog on strategic marketing & social media engagment Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:59:13 +0000 http://www.mikekujawski.ca/?p=1154#comment-34739 [...] largest real-time conversation database to which you have full access to” (take a look at my rant to Twitter haters if you want my full explanation on this). I realize Twitter can surely be much more than that, but [...] [...] largest real-time conversation database to which you have full access to” (take a look at my rant to Twitter haters if you want my full explanation on this). I realize Twitter can surely be much more than that, but [...]

]]> http://www.mikekujawski.ca/2010/02/04/my-response-to-the-twitter-debate-on-the-nyt-and-new-yorker-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-24628 @marun2 on Twitter Fri, 05 Feb 2010 08:33:08 +0000 http://www.mikekujawski.ca/?p=1154#comment-24628 Twitter is good as a real-time conversation channel and you can follow people that you wouldnt have otherwise have had access to. For example, take celebrity personalities like Obama and BillGates. Without Twitter, would you have had access near them or would they even post their thoughts or what they are doing at the moment where anybody could read them? In one of the comments (or in the article I cant remember clearly) someone has said Twitter is like a river into which you can dip your cup have a sip and go about your work. If you have any more than 100 people you are following you can quickly see how overloaded/overflowing/brimming this river is and how good of an exercise it is in sorting out the chaff (people posting blatant spam, quotes, re-quotes, etc., nothing original). This sort of information overload when we are faced with regularly, will help us evolve into better handlers and consumers/propagators of information, in the long run. Twitter is good as a real-time conversation channel and you can follow people that you wouldnt have otherwise have had access to. For example, take celebrity personalities like Obama and BillGates. Without Twitter, would you have had access near them or would they even post their thoughts or what they are doing at the moment where anybody could read them? In one of the comments (or in the article I cant remember clearly) someone has said Twitter is like a river into which you can dip your cup have a sip and go about your work. If you have any more than 100 people you are following you can quickly see how overloaded/overflowing/brimming this river is and how good of an exercise it is in sorting out the chaff (people posting blatant spam, quotes, re-quotes, etc., nothing original). This sort of information overload when we are faced with regularly, will help us evolve into better handlers and consumers/propagators of information, in the long run.

]]>