marketing & social media strategy consultant and trainer focused primarily on helping public sector organizations achieve their objectives more efficiently and effectively

international keynote speaker on the topics of strategic marketing, new media, modern communications, social media engagement and government 2.0

Public Sector Marketing 2.0 - Mike Kujawski's blog on government, association and non-profit marketing in a Web 2.0 world

emailrss
May 09, 2008

Top Business Gurus – do you have a favourite?

The top 5 most influential business thinkers, according to a recent Wall Street Journal ranking , are as follows:

1. Gary Hamel – Strategy Guru

2. Thomas L. Friedman – New York Times Columnist

3. Bill Gates – Microsoft Chairman

4. Malcolm Gladwell – Author “Tipping Point”

      5. Howard Gardner- Harvard Professor

business-thinkers1.jpg

No surprises there.

The remaining 15 are as follows:

6. Philip Kotler – Northwestern professor

7. Robert B. Reich – Ex-labor secretary

8. Daniel Goleman – Psychologist

9. Henry Mitzberg – McGill professor

10. Steven R. Covey – Author,’7 Habits of Highly Effective People’

11. Jeffrey Pfeffer – Stanford professor

12. Peter M. Senge – Author,’The Fifth Discipine’

13. Richard Branson – Virgin founder

14. Michael E. Porter – Harvard professor

15. Michael S. Dell – Dell founder

16. Geert Hofstede – Author, ‘Culture’s Consequences’

17. Clayton M. Christiansen – Harvard professor

18. Jack Welch – Former GE CEO

19. Tom Peters – Author, ‘In Search of Excellence’

20. Myron S. Scholes – Nobel laureate

After reading the full list, I began to wonder who has made the most impact on my personal development as a business strategist/marketer. I have read books or articles by all the authors listed. I use formulas and principles developed by Michael Porter (Porter’s 5-forces) , Geert Hofstede (Cultural Dimensions) and Philip Kotler (Social Marketing) in almost every strategy I develop (where applicable). I have even been inspired enough to take immediate action just by watching interviews with Richard Branson and listening to success stories like that of Michael S. Dell. However, all this thinking made me realize that I don’t have one single guru. Everybody has played their part, not to mention a whole slew of existing experts (and perhaps potential future Top-20 gurus) like Don Tapscott, Jim Collins, Chris Anderson, Mitch Joel, Seth Godin, Joseph Jaffe, or even my bosses Bernie Colterman and Jim Mintz.

I then (out of curiosity) looked at the methodology for this list and noticed that for the first time Google search results were incorporated as determinant factors, and rightfully so. For too long business guru influence was measured solely by amount of publications or scholarly journal articles (which is important, but only measures the influence on a niche segment). Nowadays, if you want to establish yourself as a guru, or sustain your existing position as a guru, you absolutely must have a strong digital presence. The existing gurus are lucky that their publishers, agents, communities of readers, etc… actively talk about them and create digital content mentioning them online. They don’t have to get personally involved (although it would be great if they did).

The new, up and coming gurus on the other hand, absolutely should (and are) all personally involved in creating, sharing, responding and listing to digital content using social media (blogging, podcasting, etc…) to boost their reputations and carfeully manage their own personal brands. They understand that the rules have changed. It will be interesting to see how many gurus on the Top 20 list a decade from now, will have gotten there thanks to social media.

The potential impact a single individual can have on others has always amazed me. My own personal goal is to find that ideal balance of absorbing a bit of everything around me (kind of like a sponge) while at the same time trying hard to push my field further ahead with new ideas.

Who are your favourite gurus and what are your thoughts on the list compiled by the Wall Street Journal?

Read more...
May 02, 2008

Podcasting Explained

I’m sure that by now, the creator of this video series (leelefever) needs no introduction. Here’s his latest on Podcasting…

Read more...
April 22, 2008

Wikipedia Zealots vs. The World

There has a been great deal of discussion and controversy lately regarding the accuracy of Wikipedia entries and the existence of so-called Wikipedia “Zealots” controlling and manipulating the information with their inherent biases. Lawrence Solomon (an editor for the Financial Post) wrote an article last Saturday (April 12th) entitled: Wikipedia’s Zealots – The thought police at the supposedly independent site are fervently enforcing the climate orthodoxy. -where he provided a play-by-play of how his entry had been repeatedly edited by a single editor holding a different opinion on climate change. In response the blogosphere is questioning the accuracy and reliability of Wikipedia as well as it’s “loss of innocence” so to say.

So what are my thoughts on all of this?

It’s unfortunate, but I think this will always occur to some extent. This is why communism doesn’t work in practice (someone needs to control the system for it to work) and why democracy has a tremendous rich/poor gap (elite in control). The good news is that thanks to social media, we now have the means to discuss these issues publicly and start up conversations with a worldwide audience. Just look at the amount of discussion on the topic of “Wikipedia Zealots” since that Financial Post article was published (Google the term or just do a Technorati Search).

Being “aware” and “informed” is crucial. Each individual still has the responsibility not to take any piece of information at face-value and determine potential biases. Think of it this way, if you were reading a particular entry in Encyclopedia Britannica you would probably assume it to be true even though the individual biases of the particular academic(s) that wrote the article would be inherent in the text (even if minimal). It would not be questioned. However, with Wikipedia, the entries are constantly being questioned and as a result stirring discussion that continually makes them better. I can guarantee you that this climate change entry (mentioned in the Financial Post article) will be re-written over time to accommodate multiple views thanks in large part to the controversy surrounding it. There will probably even be a Wikipedia entry written on the “Wikipedia controversy surrounding the Lawrence Solomon article”. The wisdom of the crowd, in my opinion will therefore prevail in the end. Nobody ever said it was a straight road with no hurdles…

What are your thoughts?

039wikipedia_468x4501.jpg

Read more...
Page 49 of 73« First...10204849506070...Last »